Automobile & Food
Recall Lawsuit Funding.

It is a non-recourse pre-settlement cash advance based on the potential proceeds of a qualifying pending product liability or personal injury claim. FCA evaluates the underlying case with the claimant's attorney.

Potentially. FCA may review qualifying claims involving injuries allegedly caused or worsened by defective vehicles or components, including airbags, brakes, tires and other safety-related parts.

Potentially. Qualifying claims involving contaminated food, foodborne illness, undeclared allergens or other dangerous food products may be reviewed when the claimant has a pending legal claim and attorney representation.

Not necessarily. Recall status can be relevant evidence, but product liability claims can involve alleged defects even when a formal recall has not been issued. FCA evaluates the pending legal claim rather than recall status alone.

Yes. FCA generally works with represented claimants because the attorney provides case information needed for review.

FCA describes its legal funding as case-based rather than traditional consumer lending, and it does not require a traditional credit or employment check.

Funding can provide financial flexibility for rent, groceries, utilities, transportation, medical costs, ongoing care and other household obligations while the case is pending, subject to the funding agreement.

Yes. FCA reviews qualifying automobile recall, food contamination and other product liability claims in California, including matters handled by attorneys across Southern California, the Bay Area, Sacramento and other California communities.

Yes. FCA also reviews qualifying claims in other states where legal funding is available. Eligibility, terms and availability can vary by jurisdiction and case.